Quality Meets Quantity: Case Studies, Conditional Probability, and Counterfactuals
نویسنده
چکیده
In contrast to statistical methods, a number of case study methods—collectively referred to as Mill’s methods, used by generations of social science researchers—only consider deterministic relationships. They do so to their detriment because heeding the basic lessons of statistical inference can prevent serious inferential errors. Of particular importance is the use of conditional probabilities to compare relevant counterfactuals. A prominent example of work using Mill’s methods is Theda Skocpol’s States and Social Revolutions. Barbara Geddes’s widely assigned critique of Skocpol’s claim of a causal relationship between foreign threat and social revolution is valid if this relationship is considered to be deterministic. If, however, we interpret Skocpol’s hypothesized causal relationship to be probabilistic, Geddes’s data support Skocpol’s hypothesis. But Skocpol, unlike Geddes, failed to provide the data necessary to compare conditional probabilities. Also problematic for Skocpol is the fact that when one makes causal inferences, conditional probabilities are of interest only insofar as they provide information about relevant counterfactuals.
منابع مشابه
Counterfactuals, indicative conditionals, and negation under uncertainty: Are there cross-cultural differences?
In this paper we study selected argument forms involving counterfactuals and indicative conditionals under uncertainty. We selected argument forms to explore whether people with an Eastern cultural background reason differently about conditionals compared to Westerners, because of the differences in the location of negations. In a 2× 2 between-participants design, 63 Japanese university student...
متن کاملA Probabilistic Semantics for Counterfactuals. Part A
This is part A of a paper in which we defend a semantics for counterfactuals which is probabilistic in the sense that the truth condition for counterfactuals refers to a probability measure. Because of its probabilistic nature, it allows a counterfactual ‘if A then B’ to be true even in the presence of relevant ‘A and not B’-worlds, as long such exceptions are not too widely spread. The semanti...
متن کاملMeasuring Influence for Dependent Voters: A Generalization of the Banzhaf Measure
We construct a new measure of voting power that is a reasonable measure of influence even if the votes are not cast independently. The crucial building blocks of our measure are probabilities of counterfactuals, such as the probability that the outcome of the vote would have been yes, had a voter voted yes rather than no as she did in the real world. The probabilities of such counterfactuals ar...
متن کاملdiscussed in Federico Stella, Criminal omissions, causality, probability, counterfactuals: Medical-surgical activity
متن کامل
A Probabilistic Semantics for Counterfactuals. Part B
This is part B of a paper in which we defend a semantics for counterfactuals which is probabilistic in the sense that the truth condition for counterfactuals refers to a probability measure. Because of its probabilistic nature, it allows a counterfactual ‘if A then B’ to be true even in the presence of relevant ‘A and not B’-worlds, as long such exceptions are not too widely spread. The semanti...
متن کامل